Choosing a journal involves more than comparing impact factors. Wallace researches candidate journals and prepares a structured comparison of journal scope, article requirements, indexing, publication information, and the relationship between your manuscript and each journal.
A journal can be reputable and still be a poor fit for a particular manuscript. Scope, article type, research method, audience, publication model, and submission requirements all matter when deciding where to submit.
We look at whether the manuscript topic and research approach align with the journal's stated aims, scope, and recently published work.
We review article types, author guidelines, manuscript limits, indexing information, publication model, and other practical submission considerations.
The report organizes journal information into a consistent framework so authors can compare several realistic options instead of relying on a single metric.
The current Wallace service describes a structured process built around 40 evaluation indicators and multiple information sources.
The exact information available varies by journal, but the report is designed to examine both journal-level information and the relationship between the journal and your manuscript.
The service provides a researched shortlist of six candidate journals together with comparison information intended to help you make the final selection.
Wallace identifies six candidate journals based on the manuscript information and the research conducted during the screening process.
The report is not a promise that any journal will accept the manuscript. Editorial screening and peer review remain entirely under the journal's control.
Each candidate can be reviewed through a common set of journal-quality, publication-format, manuscript-fit, author, and literature-related considerations.
Wallace's existing sample materials show the structure and type of information used in earlier journal-selection reports.
View an archived report for Evaluation and Program Planning to see how journal information and manuscript-fit questions were organized.
View Sample ReportThis companion document explains the purpose of the journal-selection report and how its different evaluation sections are intended to be read.
View Report ExplanationThe more complete the manuscript information, the more effectively the research can focus on relevant candidate journals.
Upload the full paper when possible so the research team can understand the study topic, method, structure, and intended contribution.
Keywords and the manuscript reference list provide useful context for identifying related journals, research communities, and previously published work.
Tell us about indexing requirements, publication deadlines, open-access preferences, or other practical constraints that may affect your journal choice.
A few important points to keep in mind before using any journal-targeting service.
No. The service helps authors compare candidate journals using available information. Editorial screening, peer review, revision requests, and acceptance decisions are controlled by the journal and cannot be guaranteed.
Not necessarily. Impact metrics may be relevant to some authors, but journal scope, readership, article type, research method, publication model, indexing requirements, and manuscript fit can also be important.
Yes. Journals can change editors, fees, indexing status, submission systems, author guidelines, publication schedules, and other policies. Authors should therefore confirm critical requirements again before submission.
Yes. Depending on your needs, separate services are available for journal formatting, manuscript editing, translation, and journal-submission support.
Send us your manuscript, references, keywords, and any journal requirements that matter to you. We can review the project and confirm the journal-selection service scope, turnaround time, and quotation.